- Belgian MPs may allow terminally ill children and those with dementia access to euthanasia
- Pro-euthanasia advocate Dr. Philip Nitschke says debate must avoid moral panic, dogma
- Nitschke: If a patient’s suffering cannot be relieved, what should the State do?
- “I hope no one I love will ever need to use such laws, but draw comfort from them”
Editor’s note: Dr. Philip Nitschke is the director of pro-euthanasia group Exit International and author of the Peaceful Pill Handbook. Follow him on Twitter @philipnitschke. The opinions expressed in this article are solely his.
(CNN) — The time was always going to come when society would need to face the pointy end of the voluntary euthanasia debate: Those hard cases that would challenge most people’s support for the issue, the cases and circumstances which constitute never-before trodden ground.
While in most Western countries polls repeatedly show strong community support for a terminally ill person’s right to obtain medical assistance to die, the results would likely be quite different if the person involved was not an adult, was not of sound mind or was not, in the strictest sense, terminally ill.
As Belgium decides whether to extend the right to euthanasia to those who have Alzheimer’s and to children, the sharp end of the debate is staring us all in the face, regardless of where we live.
The euthanasia argument is about to escalate to heights unknown: We will all be challenged about how to have a good debate, a rational debate as members of the human race, and in being challenged, we must guard against the moral panic that this issue will inevitably throw up.
The issues on the table are too important for hysterical indignation and fundamental religious dogma. We are all grown-ups. The debate we are set to have — some two decades after the world’s first right to die law was passed in Australia’s Northern Territory — should be grown-up too, even if some of the stakeholders we are about to discuss are not.
Historically, children and people with Alzheimer’s are two segments of the community that have been viewed as having little or no agency, something that is referred to as ‘capacity’ in legal terms. Generally speaking, neither group has been held to be competent to make decisions that would be in their best interests. Yet this is what the Belgians are now planning.
The opposite view: Euthanasia – we can live without it…
For many in the ageing population, there are few fears which top that of getting dementia. Anyone who has watched a loved family member sink into the abyss of confusion and disorientation will know the utter terror that can accompany the process, as the person in question tries to juxtapose moments of clarity with the awfulness of knowing one’s grip on reality — and with it one’s dignity and sense of self — is slipping.
In New Zealand earlier this year, the
Incoming Search Terms:
Child right to die: For
Child, right
